Search results for: “SMRP CMRPを習う:100%の合格率を持つCertified Maintenance & Reliability Professional Exam 試験 CMRP 資格講座 🐠 ▛ CMRP ▟を無料でダウンロード➠ www.goshiken.com 🠰ウェブサイトを入力するだけCMRP的中率”
-
The Implied Promise of a Guaranteed Education in the United States and How the Failure to Deliver It Equitably Perpetuates Generational Poverty
The United States is known as a country where anything is possible. Immigrants, foreigners, and citizens alike know what it means when someone says, “the American Dream”—that anything is achievable in the United States and that everyone has a chance…
-
George Floyd’s Legacy: Reforming, Relating, and Rethinking Through Chauvin’s Conviction and Appeal under a Felony-Murder Doctrine Long-Weaponized against People of Color
Minnesota’s second-degree felony-murder statute represents a unique and creative charging mechanism that affords wide discretion to prosecutors. This makes it ripe for inequitable application. It is the most serious charge brought against George Floyd’s killer, Derek Chauvin. Prosecutors can find…
-
Antisemitism, Near, and a Threshold for Ignominy
In recent years, the tension between the values of the First Amendment Free Speech doctrine and the desire to protect minority communities against the destructive effects of hateful speech has been investigated extensively. A recent example is the compelling discussion…
-
Sign Here: How Parental Waivers Exceed the Bounds of Parents’ Fundamental Rights
The purpose of exculpatory contracts has always been to mitigate businesses’ and institutions’ economic risk. The purpose of parental due process rights is to promote child well-being by limiting state intrusion into family life. Since exculpation entered the domain of…
-
The Lynching of George Floyd: Black Theology, Protest, and Racial Justice
[Lynching] is not the creature of an hour, the sudden outburst of uncontrolled fury, or the unspeakable brutality of an insane mob. It represents the cool, calculating deliberation of intelligent people who openly avow that there is an “unwritten law”…
-
From Poverty to Personhood: Gideon Unchained
Injustice is born in poverty and lives in prison. Every day, the U.S. prison system sacrifices millions of futures, allowing inmates to be lost in the machinery of a system that excludes lawyers from the last line of defense. Neither…
-
Boarding Mental Health Patients in Minnesota Emergency Departments–The Unintended Consequence of an Inadequate Mental Health System
Mental illness has become increasingly prevalent throughout our society. It is estimated that one in five adults already suffer from a mental health condition each year. The situation has undoubtedly worsened with twice as many adults now reportedly struggling with…
-
Civil Disobedience: A Constitutional Alternative to Injustice
On October 11, 2016, four individuals shut down the Enbridge oil pipelines running through Clearwater County. These four individuals traveled to the small town of Leonard, Minnesota, and cut their way into the valve station. Two of them accessed the…
-
The $2 Billion-Plus Price of Injustice: A Methodological Map for Police Reform in the George Floyd Era
The death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020 under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer forced America again to confront the connection between racism and law enforcement. It also compelled the City of Minneapolis to act. Merely a…
-
Some Reflections of a Métis Law Student and Assistant Professor on Indigenous Legal Education in Canada
I am a citizen of the Manitoba Métis Federation. My mother’s and father’s families are originally from the area surrounding the Red River in Manitoba. Sometime after the Red River Resistance in 1870, my family went west into Saskatchewan, where…
-
Submit Content for Publication
The Law Review seeks to publish original legal scholarship of regional, national, and international importance, with a special focus on issues impacting the legal landscape in Minnesota. We accept works not only for their value in ongoing academic debate, but…
-
The Reasonable Limits of Narrowing Construction—State v. Hensel, 901 N.W.2D 166 (Minn. 2017)
In State v. Hensel, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a disorderly conduct statute was unconstitutionally overbroad because it reached conduct protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Hensel dissent agreed that the statute was overbroad,…
-
Criminal Law: The System is Rigged: Criminal Restitution Is Blind to the Victim’s Fault—State v. Riggs
In State v. Riggs, the Minnesota Supreme Court decided whether a trial court may reduce a crime victim’s restitution award when the victim was the initial aggressor. The restitution statute, Minnesota Statutes section 611A.045, provides criteria that trial courts must…
-
Race-Based Hostile Work Environment Claims in Federal and Minnesota Courts: A Historical Perspective on the Development of the “Severe or Pervasive” Standard
The two primary statutes that protect Minnesotans against race-based harassment in the workplace are the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), enacted in 1955, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Since their enactment, courts have seemingly narrowed…
-
Kenneh v. Homeward Bound, Inc: Potential Impacts of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s Not-So-Severe “Severe or Pervasive” Standard to Race Harassment Claims Under the Minnesota Human Rights Act
In Kenneh v. Homeward Bound, Inc., the Minnesota Supreme Court addressed a long-disputed issue in employment law: whether and how the federal case-created “severe or pervasive” standard applies to claims of hostile environment sexual harassment under the Minnesota Human Rights…
-
Preempting State Prevention: How FDA Regulation Ensures Access to Abortion Medication
Abortion access is, once again, at the center of national debate after the recent Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health. The Court’s decision in Dobbs overturned constitutional abortion protections that were defined by Roe v. Wade and…
-
Prioritizing the Welfare of Youth: Design Failure in Juvenile Justice and Building the Restorative Alternative
Should children who commit crimes be processed as criminals? One might argue that Minnesota has formally answered this as no. The juvenile justice system operates with procedural rules that are distinct from adult criminal law. A criminal complaint does not…
-
Levels of Generality & Originalism: Proposing a New Way Forward as Originalism Continues to Expand
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, marks the next evolution in U.S. gun laws as the judiciary continues to define the limits state actors can place on law-abiding citizens. Underlying the case’s merits is the revival…
-
Achieving Diversity on Corporate Boards: Engagement and Education; Not Legislation
In September 2018, California became the first state to enact a law requiring publicly traded companies with principal executive offices in their state to have at least one woman on the board of directors by the end of 2019. The…
-
Civil Procedure: You’ve Been Served . . . Or Have You?—Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings
In Jaeger v. Palladium, the Minnesota Supreme Court adopted a plain meaning construction of the “then residing therein” requirement for substitute service at an individual’s usual place of abode, rejecting the nexus test originally advanced by the Minnesota Court of…
-
Affirming a Pragmatic Development of Tribal Jurisprudential Principles
In theory, if not reality, each tribal judiciary attempts to conscientiously serve the community that created it. This simple proposition likely binds jurists from across the globe regardless of race, ethnicity, or nationality. Beyond that similarity, tribal court systems differ…
-
Traditional Problems: How Tribal Same-Sex Marriage Bans Threaten Tribal Sovereignty
In another time he would have been honored. Instead he was murdered. The above statement is from the PBS documentary Two Spirits, a film examining the life and tragic death of Fred Martinez, a sixteen- year-old Navajo Indian, born physically…
-
More “Substantial Harm” Than Good: Recrafting FOIA’s Exemption 4 after Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media
In the early 1970s, the National Parks and Conservation Association (Association), an independent organization focused on advocacy related to the National Parks System, sought records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) pertaining to concession operations run at National Parks…
-
Shaping Intellectual Property Rights Through Human Rights Adjudication: The Example of the European Court of Human Rights
In Europe, important developments such as the entering into force of the Treaty of Lisbon—which placed the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union at the very top of the hierarchy of norms—and the direct applicability by national courts…
-
Criminal Law: The Dangers of Incomplete Statutory Interpretation and the Unfortunate Equal Protection Implications that Follow–Heilman v. Courtney, 926 N.W.2d 387 (Minn. 2019)
In Heilman v. Courtney, the Minnesota Supreme Court decided that a person convicted of a felony-level Driving While Intoxicated offense (felony DWI) is “released from prison” under Minnesota statute when he departs from prison to participate in Phase II of…