Volume 42, Issue 5
November 2016
-
Introduction: An Intentional Conversation About Public Engagement and Decision-Making: Moving from Dysfunction and Polarization to Dialogue and Understanding
The Dispute Resolution Institute (DRI) was founded in 1991 under the leadership of Bobbi McAdoo and its first symposium, Moving to the Next Level in Transformative Mediation: Practice, Research and Policy, was held in 1999. Over the course of the next sixteen years, DRI developed and refined a particular methodology for its symposia, captured by…
-
Community, Autonomy, and the Paradox of Public Engagement
“The point of political equality is not merely to create spaces free from domination, but also to engage all members of a community equally in the work of creating and constantly recreating that community.” Some years ago, when Christopher Moore, my partner at CDR Associates and I were asked to facilitate a major public dialogue…
-
A New American’s Perspective: Improving Public Engagement by Rededicating Our Society to Democratic Ideals
The Hamline University School of Law held a symposium discussing public engagement (Symposium) on October 23–24, 2015. As a member of the Symposium’s panel, “Setting the Context,” I agreed to write the current article. At the time, I was the executive director of the Minnesota Council on Latino Affairs, a position I retired from in…
-
Shifting the Locus of Power in Public Engagement: The Revolution Will Not Be Funded by the Non-Profit Industrial Complex
The opening plenary of Hamline University School of Law Dispute Resolution Institute’s 2015 symposium, “An Intentional Conversation About Public Engagement and Decision-Making: Moving from Dysfunction and Polarization to Dialogue and Understanding,” sought to frame a deep and engaged discussion of the most challenging questions and concerns about public engagement. The opening session’s theme leaders approached…
-
Cultivating Courageous Communities through the Practice and Power of Dialogue
We need community to get things done. Community rests on relationships. Relationships grow from conversations. Conversations cultivate community. I’ve been a gardener for years; for most of them, with hit-or- miss results. Sometimes a pretty good yield, sometimes mostly weeds. That all changed a couple of years ago when a woman at work taught me…
-
From Conflict to Community: The Contribution of Circle Process in Moving from Dysfunction and Polarization to Dialogue and Understanding in Direct Public Engagement in Local Government Decision-Making
The Circle process is a means of addressing conflict that offers a great deal of promise for addressing the dysfunction and polarization that so often marks efforts to employ direct public engagement in local government decision-making of many ostensibly democratic communities today. This article describes that promise and the structure of Circle practice which give…
-
Ally-ship and Dispute Resolution Practitioners: A Continuum
In mediation and other alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes, context matters. For instance, it makes sense that a facilitative mediator would want all sides to share their perspectives and viewpoints on themselves, on the other parties, and ultimately on the conflict itself. This is because the context of a conflict—and those involved in it—provides the…
-
Increasing Productive Communication in Local Government and Decreasing Barriers to Community Interactions
Minnesota has traditionally been a leader in civic engagement. Its statutes reflect that, with an extensive system of local government bodies and an equally extensive framework of “sunshine” laws designed to promote public access to the information those local governments use to make decisions. However, political conflict is increasing at all levels. As it does,…
-
Public Engagement and Decision-Making: Moving Minnesota Forward to Dialogue and Deliberation
The 2015 Hamline University School of Law Dispute Resolution Institute’s symposium brought together elected officials, public managers, scholars, and practitioners of dispute resolution, for dialogue, deliberation, and to brainstorm ideas for how Minnesota might use more innovative public engagement processes across local, regional, tribal, and state governance. How to build more meaningful public engagement in…
-
Resolving Divisive Social Issues: A Case Study of the Minnesota Child Custody Dialogue
Two interesting and contradictory trends in American politics are germane to the field of dispute resolution: polarization and collaboration. The former gets a lot more attention than the latter. Let’s follow the trend and start with polarization. A recent Pew Research Center report shows that Americans are more divided along political lines than any other…
-
From Dysfunction and Polarization to Legislation: Native American Religious Freedom Rights and Minnesota Autopsy Law
In October of 2015, Hamline University School of Law’s Dispute Resolution Institute held a Symposium titled, An Intentional Conversation About Public Engagement and Decision-Making: Moving from Dysfunction and Polarization to Dialogue and Understanding. The focus was on Minnesota as a microcosm of the larger national conversation. Earlier that same year, Minnesotans saw a drama unfold…