Volume 52, Issue 3

  • Article

    Vicarious Liability in Sexual Misconduct Cases in Minnesota

    by
    Mike Steenson

    Tort claims based on sexual misconduct present significant difficulties for victims seeking redress for the harm caused. Even if a victim prevails on a tort theory, the offender may be unable to satisfy the judgment. The issue then becomes whether the offender’s employer should be held liable for the victim’s injuries. Plaintiffs may pursue suits…

  • Note

    Premium Injustice: Addressing the Harms That Cash Bail Premiums Inflict on the Non-Convicted

    by
    Jeffery L. Young

    In the United States, when the government criminally charges someone but later dismisses the charges or fails to prove guilt, the individual remains responsible for any costs incurred defending against the prosecution. This practice does not align with the presumption of innocence and the fairness principles of due process, which are central to the legal…

  • Note

    Justice for the Accomplice: Minnesota’s 2023 Accomplice Liability Amendment and Its Shortcomings

    by
    John M. Thompson

    Statistics on mass incarceration and the disproportionate imprisonment of marginalized people demand a closer scholarly look at areas where sentences may be excessive. Fundamentally, the intuitive principle that punishment should fit the crime calls for constant, careful scrutiny of sentencing practices. In this light, it is worth examining Minnesota’s recent reforms to the convergence of…

  • Note

    Rebalancing the Milk Market: A Shared-Burden Framework for Dairy and Plant-Based Producers

    by
    Isabelle Ulrich

    Over the course of the twentieth century, the U.S. dairy industry grew from small local farms to a modern sector with industrial farms selling products worldwide. This change can be attributed to dairy farms’ increased milk production per cow, largely accomplished by adopting new technology and management practices. Many of these new practices are more…